Category Archives: corsmeier

Florida lawyer suspended for 18 months for engaging in personal misconduct while acting pro se as a party in a dissolution proceeding

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss a Florida Supreme Court opinion wherein the Court imposed an 18 month suspension on a lawyer who engaged in misconduct while representing himself as a party in a dissolution … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer misconduct while representing self in divorce proceeding, Lawyer sanctions, Lawyer sanctions personal misconduct, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Connecticut lawyer who was sued for malpractice and enclosed client’s psychiatric records in public court document suspended for 2 years

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent 2 year suspension of a Connecticut lawyer who was sued for legal malpractice and released his former client’s psychiatric records in retaliation and to embarrass the client.  … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer including client confidential psychiatric records in public record malpractice lawsuit, Lawyer sanctions, Legal malpractice, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nevada lawyer suspended for 6 months and 1 day for displaying a gun at a deposition and other “appalling behavior”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent 6 month and 1 day suspension of a Nevada lawyer for brandishing a gun at a deposition, using derogatory language and repeatedly making inappropriate statements, and other … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer criminal misconduct, Lawyer disruption of tribunal, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer misconduct 6 month suspension for brandishing gun at deposition and disparaging comments, Lawyer misconduct disparaging and improper comments, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s RJA committee proposes amendments to RJA Rule 2.505 clarifying requirements for substitute attorneys

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent draft amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration which would clarify the requirements for substitute attorneys in litigation matters. According to an article in the July … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 proposed Florida RJA 2.505 revisions- stand-in covering substitute counsel, corsmeier, Florida lawyer covering counsel proposed rules, Florida Rules of Judicial Administration RJA, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee approves staff opinion addressing lawyer responses to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee’s recent approval of Florida Bar Staff Opinion 38049, which addresses lawyer responses to negative online reviews. On June 15, 2018, the Florida Bar’s … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Avvo’s new parent company, Internet Brands, states it is discontinuing AVVO Legal Services effective July 2018

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the communication sent by Internet Brands, which recently acquired AVVO, sent a letter to the Deputy Counsel for the North Carolina Bar Authorized Practice Committee, advising that it is … Continue reading

Posted in 2017 New Jersey Joint Ethics Opinion AVVO referral service violates Bar Rules, 2018 New Jersey Supreme Court order denying review of 2017 AVVO joint ethics opinion, Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, AVVO - BOG opinion that AVVO Advisors is a lawyer referral service, AVVO Legal Advisor- termination of program/service, corsmeier, Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor, Florida Lawyer Referral Services, Indiana ethics opinion 18-1- AVVO Advisor violation of fee, referral and other Bar rules, Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment, lawyer referral fees, Lawyer Referral Services, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Jersey Supreme Court declines to review ethics opinion finding that AVVO’s referral program violates Bar Rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent New Jersey Supreme Court Order denying a petition requesting review of the New Jersey Ethics Opinion which found that AVVO’s referral program violated that state’s Bar rules.  … Continue reading

Posted in 2017 New Jersey Joint Ethics Opinion AVVO referral service violates Bar Rules, 2018 New Jersey Supreme Court order denying review of 2017 AVVO joint ethics opinion, corsmeier, Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor, joe corsmeier, Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment, lawyer referral fees, Lawyer Referral Services, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment