Category Archives: corsmeier

Two Texas lawyers arrested on conspiracy to commit murder charges in alleged plot to kill another lawyer

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent arrest of two lawyers in Waco, Texas, on charges of felony conspiracy to commit capital murder in an alleged plot to kill another attorney. According to media … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Criminal misconduct murder for hire, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer criminal misconduct murder for hire, Lawyer professionalism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New Jersey lawyer suspended for, inter alia, revealing confidential information in review of former client’s business

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent New Jersey Supreme Court opinion which imposed a one year suspension on a lawyer for, inter alia, providing a negative public review of a client’s business on Yelp and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer misrepresentation, Lawyer negative Yelp review, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer sanctions, Lawyer sanctions for revealing confidential information, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Lawyers and social media, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ABA Formal Opinion 491 discusses a lawyer’s obligation to avoid counseling or assisting a client in a crime or fraud

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent ABA  Formal Opinion 491 (issued 4/29/20), which discusses and provides guidance regarding a lawyer’s obligation to avoid counseling or assisting in crime or fraud in non-litigation settings.  The … Continue reading

Posted in ABA opinion 491- lawyer's obligation to avoid counseling or assisting client in crime or fraud, ABA opinions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New York removes current mental health and impairment question from NY Bar admission application

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent decision by New York to eliminate the current mental health question regarding current mental, emotional, psychiatric, nervous or behavioral disorder or condition, or alcohol, drug or other … Continue reading

Posted in Bar admission, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, New York Bar admission mental health questions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Ethics Committee votes to publish proposed opinion providing guidance in responding to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent vote by the Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee (PEC) to publish a proposed ethics advisory opinion providing guidance to lawyers in responding to negative online reviews and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Proposed Florida Bar ethics opinion 20-1- response to negative online reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Proposed North Carolina Bar ethics opinion states that lawyers may only make “restrained” responses to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent proposed North Carolina Bar 2020 Formal Ethics Opinion 1, which states that lawyers are prohibited from revealing confidential information in response to a negative online post; however, the … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment