Tag Archives: ethics for lawyers

Indiana ethics opinion finds that AVVO Advisor services may violate referral, fee splitting, and advertising rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (April 2018) Indiana Ethics Opinion 1-18 which found that AVVO’s client referral services may violate Indiana Bar rules related to fee sharing with a non-lawyer, improper referral fees … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor, Indiana ethics opinion 18-1- AVVO Advisor violation of fee, referral and other Bar rules, joe corsmeier, Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas Ethics Opinion 671 prohibits anonymous contact with unnamed internet defamer to obtain information for deposition

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent Texas Ethics Opinion 671 which states that lawyers, and their agents, may not anonymously contact an unnamed online alleged defamer in order to obtain jurisdictional or identifying information … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics Facebook, Lawyer ethics opinion anonymous contact with unnamed internet defamer, Lawyer ethics opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nebraska ethics opinion finds lawyers can accept payment in digital virtual currency such as Bitcoin

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent Nebraska Ethics Opinion which found that lawyers may accept fees and payments in a digital virtual currency such as Bitcoin.  The ethics opinion is Nebraska Ethics Advisory … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency, Excessive fee, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer escrow accounts, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer IOTA trust accounts, Lawyer trust accounts, lawyer unreasonable fee, Lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency, Lawyers and bitcoin, Lawyers and virtual digital currency, Nebraska ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New York Bar opinion states that lawyers must take reasonable steps to protect confidential information in a border search

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent New York City Bar Association ethics opinion which states that lawyers must take reasonable precautions to protect attorney/client confidential information if the lawyer is searched by U.S … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in border search, Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in search of digital device, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar will file petition with Florida Supreme Court with revisions to Rule 4-5.8 to clarify which clients must be notified of lawyer’s departure

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the proposed additions to the Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-5.8, which addresses the issue of what firm clients must be notified of a lawyer’s departure from the law firm.  … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Daparting lawyer and law firm ethical responsibilities, Florida Bar Rule 4-5.8 lawyers leaving law firms, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer leaving law firm, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Bar will file petition with advertising rule amendment regarding lawyer’s use of “expert” and “specialist” on October 15, 2016

Hello and welcome to this u Ethics Alert regarding the proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 with new subsection 4-1.14(a)(5) related to claims of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements.  The BOG approved the rule amendment and the Bar will … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Lawyer Professionalsim, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer advertising rules federal lawsuit, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, lawyer certification, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer use of expert and specialist, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment