Category Archives: Florida Bar ethics

Florida Bar Board of Governors reverses advertising opinion and finds that solicitation rules apply to targeted social media

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG)  reversal of a Florida Bar advertising committee opinion that found that targeted social media advertisements were not subject to the solicitation … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, Attorney ethics, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida solicitation rule 4-7.18 social media class action, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyer solicitation rules social media class action, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Ethics Committee votes to publish proposed opinion providing guidance in responding to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent vote by the Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee (PEC) to publish a proposed ethics advisory opinion providing guidance to lawyers in responding to negative online reviews and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Proposed Florida Bar ethics opinion 20-1- response to negative online reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida UPL Committee will consider New Jersey lawyer’s request for formal advisory opinion regarding remote practice from Florida

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss a New Jersey lawyer’s request for formal advisory opinion regarding remote practice related to non-Florida matters from his Florida home.  The lawyer’s request for the formal UPL opinion is … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar UPL, Florida Supreme Court, Florida UPL opinion out of state lawyers practicing in Florida, Florida UPL out of state lawyers, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Uncategorized, UPL opinions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Proposed Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 would permit exchange of contact information at business events and on business related social media

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the proposed revisions to the Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 which would permit the exchange of contact information at business events and on business-related social media, with caveats. The … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Communication with client, communication with potential clients, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 proposed comment communication with potential clients, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer communications with potential clients, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The client is missing and the statute of limitations expires soon: what can or must a lawyer do?

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the ethics issues when a client is missing (or refuses to communicate) and the statute of limitations is about to expire.  I have been asked this question (or a … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Informal Opinion 1467- filing lawsuit when client is missing, ABA opinions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, diligence, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 72-36- filing lawsuit when client is missing, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, lawyer negligence, negligence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors finds that “Ambulances Chase Us” is improper and law firm can advertise “1-800-411-Pain”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG) decisions to uphold the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Advertising (SCA) decision that “Ambulances Chase Us” is deceptive or misleading and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Florida advertising "Ambulances Chase Us", Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida lawyer advertising "411-PAIN", joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment