Category Archives: Florida Bar ethics

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss a New Jersey lawyer’s request for formal advisory opinion regarding remote practice related to non-Florida matters from his Florida home.  The lawyer’s request for the formal UPL opinion is … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar UPL, Florida Supreme Court, Florida UPL opinion out of state lawyers practicing in Florida, Florida UPL out of state lawyers, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Uncategorized, UPL opinions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Proposed Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 would permit exchange of contact information at business events and on business related social media

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the proposed revisions to the Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 which would permit the exchange of contact information at business events and on business-related social media, with caveats. The … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Communication with client, communication with potential clients, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 proposed comment communication with potential clients, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer communications with potential clients, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The client is missing and the statute of limitations expires soon: what can or must a lawyer do?

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the ethics issues when a client is missing (or refuses to communicate) and the statute of limitations is about to expire.  I have been asked this question (or a … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Informal Opinion 1467- filing lawsuit when client is missing, ABA opinions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, diligence, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 72-36- filing lawsuit when client is missing, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, lawyer negligence, negligence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors finds that “Ambulances Chase Us” is improper and law firm can advertise “1-800-411-Pain”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG) decisions to uphold the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Advertising (SCA) decision that “Ambulances Chase Us” is deceptive or misleading and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Florida advertising "Ambulances Chase Us", Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida lawyer advertising "411-PAIN", joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Supreme Court approves revised Bar advertising rule with requirements for lawyers to call themselves “experts” or “specialists”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion approving (with minor revisions) Bar Rule 4-7.14, which sets forth the requirements for Florida  lawyers to call themselves “experts” and “specialists”  in advertisements … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, 2018 revised Bar Rule- Florida Lawyer use of expert and specialist, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida lawyer advertising expert and specialist 2019 rule 4-7.14, Florida Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, lawyer advertising expert and specialist, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors approves proposed Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all lawyer advertisements

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent approval of revisions to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 by the Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG).  If implemented, the proposed revisions would prohibit misleading law firm information … Continue reading

Posted in deceit, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in advertisementss, Florida Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all advertisements, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyer misleading law firm information advertisements, Lawyers and social media, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors considers final action on proposed rule revision prohibiting misleading law firm information in all advertisements

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the potential final review of potential revisions to Florida Bar Rules 4-7.13 by the Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG), which would prohibit misleading law firm information in advertisements. … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in advertisementss, Florida Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all advertisements, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer misleading law firm information advertisements, Lawyer misrepresentation, Uncategorized | Leave a comment