Category Archives: joe corsmeier

Florida Bar Best Practices for Professional Electronic Communication: electronic hearings or proceedings

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the Florida Bar’s Henry Latimore Center for Professionalism with Best Practices for Professional Electronic Communication, specifically considerations for lawyers during electronic hearings or proceedings.  The publication is online here: https://www-media.floridabar.org/uploads/2020/06/ADA-E-communication-FINAL_May-2020.pdf  … Continue reading

Posted in ethics related to electronic hearings and proceedings, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, remote hearings and proceedings ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ABA Formal Opinion 496 addresses ethics issues related to lawyer responses to online criticism and provides guidance

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which discusses recent American Bar Association (ABA) Formal Opinion 496, which addresses ethics issues related to lawyer responses to online criticism and provides guidance.  ABA Formal Opinion 496 is here:  https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/aba-formal-opinion-496.pdf As … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Formal Opinion 496 responding to online complaints and criticism, ABA Formal Opinion 496 responding to online complkaints and criticism, ABA opinions, Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, Confidentiality and lawyer response to internet complaint criticism, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 20-1 responding to online complaints and criticism, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Proposed Florida Bar ethics opinion 20-1- response to negative online reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. District Court Judge enjoins Pennsylvania from enforcing Bar rule with broad lawyer anti-discrimination prohibitions

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent U.S. District Judge for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania’s opinion and preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of a disciplinary rule broadly prohibiting discrimination by lawyers as violative of … Continue reading

Posted in Florida Bar Rule 8.4(d) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer disparagement and discrimination, lawyer disparaging other lawyers and judges in pleadings, lawyer disparaging remarks to non-client witness, Lawyer misconduct disparaging and improper comments, U.S. District Court Judge enjoins Pennsylvania from enforcing Bar rule with broad lawyer anti-discrimination prohibitions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Utah Supreme Court approves Rocket Lawyer and other entities to participate in regulatory “sandbox”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent approval of Rocket lawyer and other entities to participate in Utah’s pilot regulatory “sandbox program.  On September 8, 2020, Rocket Lawyer announced that it was one of the … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice, 2020 Arizona Supreme Court permits non-lawyer fee sharing and ownership of law firms, 2020 Utah pilot program permitting non-lawyer practice and law firm ownership, Arizona limited legal advice pilot program 2020-2021, Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, lawyers sharing fees with non-lawyers, Uncategorized, Utah sandbox approves Rocket Matter as legal service rovider | Leave a comment

Arizona becomes first U.S. state to authorize non-lawyer ownership of law firms and fee sharing

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the Arizona Supreme Court’s recent implementation of rule revisions which will permit non-lawyers to own law firms and share fees with lawyers, and also makes other significant rule revisions.  … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice, 2020 Arizona Supreme Court permits non-lawyer fee sharing and ownership of law firms, 2020 Utah pilot program permitting non-lawyer practice and law firm ownership, ABA revised advertising rules, Arizona limited legal advice pilot program 2020-2021, Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, corsmeier, Ethics and nonlawyer compensation, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer advertising and solicitation APRL report, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, lawyers sharing fees with non-lawyers, Non-lawyer Limited Licensing, non-lawyer limited practice, Non-lawyer ownership of law firms, Non-lawyer practice of law, Uncategorized, Utah pilot program permitting non-traditional legal services, including non-lawyer firm ownership | Leave a comment

Utah Supreme Court authorizes pilot program which, inter alia, permits non-lawyers to own law firms and share fees with lawyers

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent Utah Supreme Court approval of a pilot program which would permit non-lawyers to own law firms, share fees with lawyers, and makes other significant revisions.  The link to … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice, 2020 Utah pilot program permitting non-lawyer practice and law firm ownership, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Ethics and nonlawyer compensation, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, lawyers sharing fees with non-lawyers, Non-lawyer ownership of law firms, Non-lawyer practice of law, Uncategorized, Utah pilot program permitting non-traditional legal services, including non-lawyer firm ownership | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pennsylvania lawyer suspended after paying clients over $500,000 from own funds for false case results

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court suspension of a Pennsylvania lawyer for 4 years retroactively for falsely telling four clients that he had resolved their cases and then paying them … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, diligence, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lack of diligence, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer falsifying court documents and orders, Lawyer fraud, Lawyer lack of competence, lawyer lack of diligence, Lawyer misconduct false court documents, Lawyer misconduct false statements, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Pennsylvania Bar Association publishes ethics opinion providing guidance in preserving confidentiality while working from home during the pandemic

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recently published Pennsylvania Bar Association Formal Opinion 2020-300, which provides guidance to lawyers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.  The formal opinion is here:  https://www.pabar.org/members/catalogs/Ethics%20Opinions/formal/f2020-300.pdf As we all … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer confidentiality when working remotely and from home, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Pennsylvania ethics opinion maintaining confidentiality during pandemic, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The ethical and professional risks and hazards of sending e-mails and tips on how to avoid them

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the ethical risks and dangers of e-mails and provide tips on how to avoid them. Electronic mail has certainly become the primary form of communication for most lawyers (even … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, inadvertent disclosure, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer ethical and professional risks and hazards of sending e-mails, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment