Category Archives: joe corsmeier

ABA formal ethics opinion provides guidance for recusal of judge because of a personal relationship

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss ABA Formal Opinion 488, which provides guidance on a judge’s obligation to recuse because of a social or close personal relationship with a lawyer or party.  ABA Formal Opinion … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Opinion 488- judge recusal disqualification personal relationships, ABA opinions, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Judge disqualification, Judge recusal personal relationships, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

California ethics opinion addresses issues related to a lawyer accepting damaging document provided by a witness

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent California ethics opinion which addresses ethics issues related to accepting a damaging document provided by an individual (witness).  The ethics opinion is Los Angeles County Bar Association … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, California ethics opinion using improper document, California ethics opinion using improperly obtained document, competence, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, diligence, Ethics Opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Supreme Court approves revised Bar advertising rule with requirements for lawyers to call themselves “experts” or “specialists”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion approving (with minor revisions) Bar Rule 4-7.14, which sets forth the requirements for Florida  lawyers to call themselves “experts” and “specialists”  in advertisements … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, 2018 revised Bar Rule- Florida Lawyer use of expert and specialist, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida lawyer advertising expert and specialist 2019 rule 4-7.14, Florida Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, lawyer advertising expert and specialist, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

California Bar examines proposal that non-lawyers be permitted to provide legal advice and have a financial interest in law firms

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent proposals of a State Bar of California task force which would, inter alia, permit legal technicians to offer legal advice and also permit non-lawyers to have a … Continue reading

Posted in 2019 California non-lawyer practice and ownership of law firms proposals, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, non-lawyer limited practice, Non-lawyer ownership of law firms, Non-lawyer practice of law, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tennessee lawyer disbarred for, inter alia, false and exaggerated time entries and making false statements in court under oath

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Tennessee Supreme Court opinion disbarring a lawyer for, inter alia, giving a false statement under oath, knowingly testifying falsely in a court proceeding, and seeking an unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, Excessive fee, fraud, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice, Lawyer discipline false billings, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer false statements, Lawyer fraud, Lawyer misconduct false court documents, Lawyer misconduct false statements, Lawyer misrepresentation, Lawyer sanctions false client billings, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ABA issues Formal Opinion 487 providing guidance regarding fee divisions in contingency cases when a lawyer is replaced

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent American Bar Association Formal Opinion 487, which provides guidance regarding the requirements of fee divisions in contingency fee matters when the initial lawyer is replaced by a … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Formal Opinion 487 division of fees in contingency matters when lawyer is replaced, ABA Formal Opinion 487 division of fees in contingent matters when lawyer is replaced, Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer fee agreements, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors approves proposed Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all lawyer advertisements

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent approval of revisions to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 by the Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG).  If implemented, the proposed revisions would prohibit misleading law firm information … Continue reading

Posted in deceit, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in advertisementss, Florida Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all advertisements, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyer misleading law firm information advertisements, Lawyers and social media, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment