Tag Archives: Florida Bar

The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors votes to approve charge of “litigation cost protection insurance” premium to clients

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert will discuss the recent decision of the Florida Bar’s Board of Governors to allow lawyers to pass-through the costs of “litigation cost protection” insurance to the client. According to a recent article … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Board of Governors opinion approving charge of cost of litigation cost protection insurance to client, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer charge cost of litigation cost protection to client, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer litigation costs, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar opposes lawyer initiated petition to make appeal court finding of frivolousness “conclusive” rule violation

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Bar’s response opposing the Petition initiated by a Florida lawyer to amend Florida Bar Rule 3-4.3 which states that a final decision of the Florida Supreme Court, … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule 4-3.1 frivolous filings, Florida Bar- proposed rule would make finding of frivolous filing "conclusive determination" of Bar rule violation, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sanctions frivolous filing, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Supreme Court rejects Bar proposed advertising Rule amendment on lawyers’ use of “expert” and “specialist”

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert update on the Bar’s proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 on lawyers’ of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements which was filed in response to the federal court opinion which found the rule … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer advertising expert and specialist, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors finds that AVVO Advisor is a for-profit lawyer referral service and must comply with Bar Rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent decision by the Florida Bar’s Board of Governors to approve a BOG committee’s conclusion that AVVO Advisor is a for-profit lawyer referral service and must comply with … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, AVVO - BOG opinion that AVVO Advisors is a lawyer referral service, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Lawyer Referral Services, Florida proposed ethics advisory opinion- lawyer referral fees and lawyer matching services, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors votes to request the Florida Supreme Court to determine whether TIKD activities are UPL

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent media reports that the Florida Bar’s Board of Governors has voted to request that the Florida Supreme Court determine whether TIKD’s app and activities constitute the unlicensed … Continue reading

Posted in Bar antitrust, Florida Bar request for Florida Supreme Court TIKD UPL review, Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, North Caroline federal opinion on regulation of UPL, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s former president responds and opposes Bar’s motion to disqualify him from TIKD v. Florida Bar/Ticket Clinic antitrust suit

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert Update which will discuss the recent responses to the Bar’s Motion to Disqualify by its former president, Ramon Abadin.  The Response claims, inter alia, that the information that received was public record; … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney disqualification, Attorney ethics, Bar antitrust, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer antitrust, Uncategorized, UPL North Carolina antitrust, USSC North Carolina dental antitrust case | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Startup app TIKD sues Florida Bar for alleged antitrust violations; Florida Bar moves to disqualify former president from case

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent lawsuit filed by Startup app TIKD Services against The Florida Bar and the Ticket Clinic law firm for, inter alia, antitrust violations and the Bar’s Motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Bar antitrust, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized, UPL North Carolina antitrust, UPL, unauthorized practice of law, unlicensed practice of law, U.S. Constitution professional speech, USSC North Carolina dental antitrust case | Tagged , , | Leave a comment