Tag Archives: lawyer revealing confidential information in response to internet complaints

New Jersey lawyer suspended for, inter alia, revealing confidential information in review of former client’s business

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent New Jersey Supreme Court opinion which imposed a one year suspension on a lawyer for, inter alia, providing a negative public review of a client’s business on Yelp and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer misrepresentation, Lawyer negative Yelp review, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer sanctions, Lawyer sanctions for revealing confidential information, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Lawyers and social media, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Ethics Committee votes to publish proposed opinion providing guidance in responding to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent vote by the Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee (PEC) to publish a proposed ethics advisory opinion providing guidance to lawyers in responding to negative online reviews and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Proposed Florida Bar ethics opinion 20-1- response to negative online reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Proposed North Carolina Bar ethics opinion states that lawyers may only make “restrained” responses to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent proposed North Carolina Bar 2020 Formal Ethics Opinion 1, which states that lawyers are prohibited from revealing confidential information in response to a negative online post; however, the … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Connecticut lawyer who was sued for malpractice and enclosed client’s psychiatric records in public court document suspended for 2 years

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent 2 year suspension of a Connecticut lawyer who was sued for legal malpractice and released his former client’s psychiatric records in retaliation and to embarrass the client.  … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer including client confidential psychiatric records in public record malpractice lawsuit, Lawyer sanctions, Legal malpractice, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee approves staff opinion addressing lawyer responses to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee’s recent approval of Florida Bar Staff Opinion 38049, which addresses lawyer responses to negative online reviews. On June 15, 2018, the Florida Bar’s … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Colorado lawyer suspended for 18 months for disclosing confidential information in response to client internet criticism

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent disciplinary opinion suspending a Colorado lawyer for 18 months for disclosing confidential client information in response to their internet criticism.  The disciplinary opinion is People v. James … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment