Category Archives: TIKD motion for sanctions

U.S. Department of Justice files Statement in TIKD federal lawsuit arguing that Florida Bar is not immune from Sherman antitrust allegations

Posted on March 13, 2018 by jcorsmeier

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert Update which will discuss the recent (March 12, 2018) Statement of Interest filed by the United States Department of Justice arguing that The Florida Bar is not immune or exempt from antitrust … Continue reading →

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, Bar antitrust, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar request for Florida Supreme Court TIKD UPL review, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, TIKD antitrust lawsuit Florida Bar motion for sanctions, TIKD motion for sanctions, TIKD US DOJ Statement of Interest, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ticket Clinic law firm and individual defendants file Motion for Sanctions for frivolous lawsuit against TIKD in federal lawsuit

Posted on February 21, 2018 by jcorsmeier

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert Update which will discuss the recent Rule 11 Motion For Sanctions for Filing Frivolous Lawsuit filed by the Ticket Clinic Law Firm (Gold and Associates) and the individual defendants.  The case is … Continue reading →

Posted in Bar antitrust, corsmeier, Florida Bar request for Florida Supreme Court TIKD UPL review, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer antitrust, North Caroline federal opinion on regulation of UPL, TIKD antitrust lawsuit Florida Bar motion for sanctions, TIKD motion for sanctions, Uncategorized, UPL North Carolina antitrust, USSC North Carolina dental antitrust case | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment