Monthly Archives: May 2018

Florida lawyer disbarred for soliciting and having sex with 2 clients while they were incarcerated in jail

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion disbarring a lawyer who had solicited and sex with 2 clients in they were incarcerated in jail.  The case is The Florida Bar … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer discipline criminal misconduct, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer sex with client discipline, Lawyer sex with clients in jail disbarment, Lawyer suspension/discipline alleged sexual misconduct, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

California Supreme Court adopts new Bar ethics rules which (mostly) follow the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the California Supreme Court’s recent Order implementing new Bar ethics rules which are substantially patterned after the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.  The California Supreme Court Order approving … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Attorney ethics, California adopts ABA Model Rules, California Bar Rules 2018, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer professionalism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s BOG considers rule revisions prohibiting misleading Google ad words and permitting credit charges to clients

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the Board of Governor’s review of potential revisions to Florida Bar Rules 4-7.13, which would prohibit misleading words and phrases in Google ad words, and revisions to Florida Bar … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Bar rule prohibiting Google Ad words misdirection to another lawyer, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar rule permitting lawyer to charge client with credit card fees, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer charging client with credit card fees, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Supreme Court suspends two lawyers for conflict of interest Bar Rule violations under “hot potato doctrine”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida suspending two Florida lawyers for 30 days for violating Bar Rules related to conflicts of interest under what is being called … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, conflict of interest "hot potato" doctrine, Conflict of interest current clients, conflict of interest- former clients, corsmeier, Ethics and lawyer withdrawal, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court opinions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conflict of interest, Lawyer disqualification, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sanctions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Federal magistrate sanctions New York lawyer for lying about family emergency after Instagram posts showed she was on vacation

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss recent opinion of a U.S. District Court magistrate sanctioning a New York lawyer who claimed that she missed a deadline because of a family emergency but was apparently on … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, fraud, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyer filing false documents, Lawyer fraud, Lawyer sanctions, Lawyer sanctions Instagram, Lawyer sanctions lying in court and Instagram vacation photos, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Indiana ethics opinion finds that AVVO Advisor services may violate referral, fee splitting, and advertising rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (April 2018) Indiana Ethics Opinion 1-18 which found that AVVO’s client referral services may violate Indiana Bar rules related to fee sharing with a non-lawyer, improper referral fees … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor, Indiana ethics opinion 18-1- AVVO Advisor violation of fee, referral and other Bar rules, joe corsmeier, Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment