-
Recent Posts
- Florida Bar Board of Governors approves revised rule on qualifying provider fees and ethics opinion on “expert” and “specialist”
- Florida lawyer suspended for 18 months for engaging in personal misconduct while acting pro se as a party in a dissolution proceeding
- Connecticut lawyer who was sued for malpractice and enclosed client’s psychiatric records in public court document suspended for 2 years
- Nevada lawyer suspended for 6 months and 1 day for displaying a gun at a deposition and other “appalling behavior”
- Florida Bar’s RJA committee proposes amendments to RJA Rule 2.505 clarifying requirements for substitute attorneys
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
Categories
- 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions
- 2017 New Jersey Joint Ethics Opinion AVVO referral service violates Bar Rules
- 2018 Florida lawyer referral rule revisions matching services
- 2018 Florida lawyer referral rules qualifying providers
- 2018 New Jersey Supreme Court order denying review of 2017 AVVO joint ethics opinion
- 2018 proposed Florida RJA 2.505 revisions- stand-in covering substitute counsel
- 2018 revised Bar Rule- Florida Lawyer use of expert and specialist
- 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice
- 4-5.8 lawyers leaving law firms
- ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 481- lawyer required to advise current clients of material error
- ABA formal opinion referral fees and conflict of interest
- ABA formal opinion securing confidential information sent over internet
- ABA Formal Opinion- use of former client confidentiality information generally known exception
- ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
- ABA opinion 480- confidentiality and lawyer blogs and other public commentary
- ABA opinion lawyer's duties re receipt of subpoena for confidential documents information
- ABA opinions
- ABA Resolution 105 non-lawyer ownership of law firms
- ABA Resolutions
- Attorney discipline
- Attorney disobey order of tribunal
- Attorney disqualification
- Attorney disruptive conduct in litigation
- Attorney ethics
- Attorney Ethics sharing fees
- attorney-client privilege
- Attorney/client confidentiality
- Attorney/client privilege
- AVVO – BOG opinion that AVVO Advisors is a lawyer referral service
- AVVO Legal Advisor- termination of program/service
- Bar antitrust
- Bar rule prohibiting Google Ad words misdirection to another lawyer
- Bar Rules written fee agreements
- Board of Governors opinion approving charge of cost of litigation cost protection insurance to client
- California adopts ABA Model Rules
- California Bar Rules 2018
- California law requires split of lawyer regulation and trade association activities
- client false online statement libel
- client libel
- Client with disability
- Communication with client
- Confidential Information
- Confidentiality
- conflict of interest "hot potato" doctrine
- Conflict of interest criminal cases
- Conflict of interest current clients
- conflict of interest- former clients
- Contingency fees – lawyer retaining another lawyer or entity to resolve liens
- corsmeier
- Daparting lawyer and law firm ethical responsibilities
- deceit
- dishonesty
- Disqualification
- e-mail with disparaging comments regarding spouse and opposing counsel
- Ethics and lawyer withdrawal
- Ethics and nonlawyer compensation
- Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor
- Ethics opinion lawyer blogging
- Ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency
- Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in border search
- Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in search of digital device
- Ethics Opinions waivers of ineffective assistance and prosecutorial misconduct
- Ethics Opinions waivers of prosecutotial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel
- Excessive fee
- financial assistance to client
- Florida Bar discipline
- Florida Bar ethics
- Florida Bar ethics opinion 14-1- lawyer ethics and client social media pages
- Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 18-1- lawyer referral service qualifying provider payment
- Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality
- Florida Bar ethics opinion qualifying provider – lawyer fees
- Florida Bar Opinion 16-1 financial assistance to client
- Florida Bar proposed Advertising Advisory Opinion
- Florida Bar proposed ethics advisory opinion lawyer electronic signatures
- Florida Bar proposed ethics opinion 17-2- qualifying provider- lawyer fees
- Florida Bar request for Florida Supreme Court TIKD UPL review
- Florida Bar rule 4-1.5 resolution of extraordinary liens in contingency cases
- Florida Bar rule 4-1.8(c) amended rule all gifts from clients prohibited
- Florida Bar rule 4-1.8(e) financial assistance to client
- Florida Bar Rule 4-3.1 frivolous filings
- Florida Bar Rule 4-5.8 lawyers leaving law firms
- Florida Bar rule permitting lawyer to charge client with credit card fees
- Florida Bar Rules
- Florida Bar Rules contingent fee agreements
- Florida Bar Rules diversion
- Florida Bar Rules Reporting Misconduct
- Florida Bar Rules trust account funds
- Florida Bar Rules Trust Accounts
- Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit
- Florida Bar- proposed rule would make finding of frivolous filing "conclusive determination" of Bar rule violation
- Florida Code for Reolving Professionalsim Complaints
- Florida Judge discipline
- Florida Judge ethics
- Florida Judicial Canons
- Florida lawyer 2017 mandatory technology CLE requirements and increase in hours and
- Florida lawyer advertising
- Florida lawyer advertising past results
- Florida lawyer cloud computing
- Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions
- Florida lawyer covering counsel proposed rules
- Florida lawyer discipline- referee requires Bar to pay accused lawyer costs
- Florida lawyer mandatory technology competence CLE
- Florida Lawyer Professionalsim
- Florida Lawyer Referral Services
- Florida lawyer trust accounts
- Florida proposed ethics advisory opinion- lawyer referral fees and lawyer matching services
- Florida Rules of Judicial Administration RJA
- Florida Statutes lawyer fiduciary privilege
- Florida Supreme Court
- Florida Supreme Court lawyer fiduciary privilege
- Florida Supreme Court opinions
- Florida Supreme Court rejection of Bar proposed rule amendment on resolution of extraordinary liens in contingency matters
- former judge lawyer accepting gifts from counsel for opposing party
- fraud
- Impersonating lawyer criminal conviction and prison
- Indiana ethics opinion 18-1- AVVO Advisor violation of fee, referral and other Bar rules
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel lawyer ethics
- joe corsmeier
- Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees
- joseph corsmeier
- Judge disqualification
- Judge disqualification Facebook friends with lawyer
- judge disqualification Facebook friends with lawyer Florida Supreme Court
- Judicial candidate misconduct
- Judicial ethics accepting gifts from lawyers
- Judicial Ethics Facebook and LinkedIn
- judicial misconduct discipline
- Lawyer abuse of nonlawyer paralegal and attacks
- Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail
- Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail to Bar lawyer
- Lawyer access to juror social media and digital internet presence
- Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection
- Lawyer advertising
- Lawyer advertising actors reading testimonials
- Lawyer advertising and soliciation text messages
- Lawyer advertising and solicitation
- Lawyer advertising and solicitation APRL report
- Lawyer advertising and solicitation text messages
- Lawyer advertising and solicitation twitter
- lawyer advertising expert and specialist
- Lawyer advertising judicial opinion excerpts on website
- Lawyer advertising on Linkedin.com
- lawyer advertising past results
- Lawyer advertising rules federal lawsuit
- Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise
- Lawyer advertising testimonials
- lawyer antitrust
- Lawyer arbitrator discipline
- lawyer blogs
- Lawyer blogs advertising
- lawyer blogs false statements
- lawyer certification
- Lawyer charge cost of litigation cost protection to client
- Lawyer charging client with credit card fees
- Lawyer cloud computing
- Lawyer conduct adversely affecting fitness to practice
- Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
- Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice
- Lawyer conflict of interest
- Lawyer conflict of interest positional conflicts
- Lawyer conflict of interest relationship with witness
- Lawyer contingency agreements
- Lawyer conversion of client trust funds
- Lawyer criminal misconduct
- Lawyer criminal misconduct sexual abuse of client by hypnotism
- Lawyer disbarment
- Lawyer disbarment for practicing while suspended
- Lawyer disbarment forging court order
- Lawyer disbarment stealing and using cocaine as judge
- Lawyer disbarment trust account violations
- Lawyer discipline criminal misconduct
- Lawyer discipline false billings
- lawyer discipline for failure to respond to Bar inquiry
- Lawyer discipline for willful and flagrant failure to pay child support
- Lawyer discipline forging court order
- Lawyer discipline sanctions for failure to appear at hearing
- Lawyer discipline sexting texting with client
- lawyer discipline social media misconduct- creating false dating site profile on opposing counsel
- Lawyer discipline trust account violations
- Lawyer discipline- Bar required to pay attorney's costs
- Lawyer discipline- Bar's costs denied by referee
- Lawyer discovery disclosure sanctions
- Lawyer disloyalty to client and law firm
- Lawyer dismissal of complaint
- Lawyer dismissed complaint
- lawyer disparaging other lawyers and judges in pleadings
- Lawyer disqualification
- Lawyer disruption of tribunal
- Lawyer divorce contingent fee discipline
- Lawyer duties to replace hacked trust account funds
- Lawyer e-filing confidentiality breach sanctions
- Lawyer escrow accounts
- Lawyer ethical duties when receives earned fee subject to fee sharing arrangement
- Lawyer Ethics
- Lawyer ethics and social media
- Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing
- Lawyer ethics business transactions with clients
- Lawyer ethics Facebook
- Lawyer ethics opinion anonymous contact with unnamed internet defamer
- Lawyer ethics opinion impaired lawyers
- Lawyer ethics opinion Linkedin.com
- Lawyer ethics opinions
- Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo – improper fee splitting and referral fees
- Lawyer ethics opinions blogs and advertising
- Lawyer ethics opinions cloud computing
- Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment
- Lawyer expense reimbursement
- lawyer failure to communicate
- Lawyer failure to communicate with client
- Lawyer failure to provide closing statement PIP cases
- Lawyer failure to supervise non lawyer theft of trust funds disbarment
- Lawyer failure to supervise non-lawyers
- lawyer failure to supervise non-lawyers re trust account suspension and permanent ban on supervision of trust accounts
- Lawyer false statements
- Lawyer fee agreements
- lawyer felony suspension and reinstatement nunc pro tunc after criminal conviction reversed
- lawyer fiduciary privilege
- Lawyer filing false documents
- Lawyer Florida IOTA trust accounts rule 5-1.1 credit unions permitted
- Lawyer fraud
- Lawyer Groupon marketing
- Lawyer improper access to opposing party Facebook
- Lawyer improper access to opposing party social media
- Lawyer improper ex parte contact with judge
- Lawyer impugning judge's qualifications or integrity
- Lawyer including client confidential psychiatric records in public record malpractice lawsuit
- Lawyer IOTA trust accounts
- Lawyer lack of competence
- lawyer lack of diligence
- Lawyer leaving law firm
- Lawyer lien resolution
- Lawyer litigation costs
- Lawyer misappropriation of funds
- Lawyer misconduct 6 month suspension for brandishing gun at deposition and disparaging comments
- Lawyer misconduct disparaging and improper comments
- Lawyer misconduct false court documents
- Lawyer misconduct false statements
- lawyer misconduct in closing argument
- Lawyer misconduct marijuana advice incompetence and misrepresentation
- Lawyer misconduct smuggling contraband into prison for client
- Lawyer misconduct while representing self in divorce proceeding
- Lawyer misrepresentation
- lawyer negligence
- Lawyer non compete in employment agreement
- lawyer permanent disbarment
- Lawyer positional conflict of interest
- Lawyer practicing l;aw while suspended
- Lawyer practicing without license
- Lawyer prepring false documents
- Lawyer Professional Responsibility
- Lawyer professionalism
- Lawyer puffery
- Lawyer punitive separation agreeement with associate
- Lawyer readmission denial
- lawyer referral fees
- Lawyer referral fees legal malpractice
- Lawyer referral fees void under Chandris
- Lawyer Referral Services
- Lawyer referral services 2016 proposed revisions
- Lawyer relationship with witness and lying about it
- Lawyer required to advise current clients of material error- ABA opinion
- Lawyer restriction on right to practice in employment agreement
- lawyer revealing confidential information in motion to withdraw
- Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint
- Lawyer sanctions
- Lawyer sanctions alcohol/substance abuse
- Lawyer sanctions disbarment
- Lawyer sanctions disclosure of confidential documents
- Lawyer sanctions false client billings
- Lawyer sanctions for failing to advise clients of suspension
- Lawyer sanctions for revealing confidential information
- Lawyer sanctions for unlicensed practice of law
- Lawyer sanctions frivolous filing
- Lawyer sanctions Instagram
- Lawyer sanctions lying in court and Instagram vacation photos
- Lawyer sanctions personal misconduct
- Lawyer second opinions
- Lawyer sex with client discipline
- Lawyer sex with clients in jail disbarment
- Lawyer sexual abuse of clients
- Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers
- lawyer social media ethics and discipline
- Lawyer soliciting or accepting gifts
- lawyer stealing and using cocaine as judge
- Lawyer submitting false document in disciplinary investigation
- lawyer suing client for false online statements
- Lawyer supervision of clients
- Lawyer suspension/discipline alleged sexual misconduct
- Lawyer testamentary gifts from clients
- Lawyer trust account discipline
- Lawyer trust account ethics
- Lawyer trust account scams
- Lawyer trust accounts
- lawyer unreasonable fee
- Lawyer use of expert and specialist
- Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet
- lawyer waiver of costs
- lawyer waiver of costs financial assistance to client
- Lawyer websites
- Lawyer websites hidden text
- Lawyer websites SEO and metatags
- Lawyer withdrawal
- Lawyer written fee agreements
- Lawyer/client confidentiality
- Lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency
- Lawyers and bitcoin
- Lawyers and social media
- Lawyers and virtual digital currency
- Legal malpractice
- Legal malpractice expert witness
- Legal malpractice negligence
- Legal malpractice sufficiency of evidence and standard of care
- LegalForce v LegalZoom UPL and deceptive advertising federal lawsuit
- Mandatory arbitration Bar Rule 4-1.5(i)
- Mandatory arbitration clause in fee agreement unenforceable as violation of Rule 4-1.5(i)
- Metadata
- Metadata Lawyer Ethics
- Misrepresentations regarding CLE completion
- Motion to Disqualify Facebook friends
- Nebraska ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin
- negligence
- New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations
- non-lawyer limited practice
- Nonlawyer bonuses and pension plans
- nonrefundable fees
- North Caroline federal opinion on regulation of UPL
- privilege prohibition of inquiries into lawyer/doctor referral relationships
- Prosectorial misconduct
- Prosecutor misconduct
- Prosecutorial misconduct disciplinary sanctions
- Prosecutorial misconduct eavesdropping on attorney client conversations
- Prosecutorial misconduct lawyer ethics
- Punitive damages
- Rule 4-5.8 amendment to comment 2018
- Rule 8.4(h) conduct adversely affecting fitness to practice
- Sanctions inadvertent disclousre fo confidential documents
- TIKD antitrust lawsuit Florida Bar motion for sanctions
- TIKD Florida Bar petition w Florida Supreme Court re UPL
- TIKD motion for sanctions
- TIKD Unlicensed Practice of Law Florida
- TIKD US DOJ Statement of Interest
- Uncategorized
- Unlicensed practice of law
- UPL fraud impersonating lawyer
- UPL North Carolina antitrust
- UPL Zlien Ohio complaint
- UPL, unauthorized practice of law, unlicensed practice of law, U.S. Constitution professional speech
- USSC North Carolina dental antitrust case
- Virginia Ethics Opinion duties related to impaired lawyers
- Virginia revised advertising rules 2017
Meta
Advertisements
New Jersey lawyer is reprimanded for telling Bar discipline official that he should “go f*** himself”
Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent reprimand of a New Jersey lawyer who, inter alia, told a Bar official to GO F**K YOURSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”. The case is In the Matter of Michael Rychel, Docket … Continue reading →