joe corsmeier
Lawyer Ethics
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About

Category Archives: Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail

New Jersey lawyer is reprimanded for telling Bar discipline official that he should “go f*** himself”

Posted on March 2, 2018 by jcorsmeier

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent reprimand of a New Jersey lawyer who, inter alia, told a Bar official to GO F**K YOURSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”.  The case is In the Matter of Michael Rychel, Docket … Continue reading →

Posted in joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail, Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail to Bar lawyer, Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice, Lawyer misconduct disparaging and improper comments, Lawyer Professional Responsibility, Lawyer sanctions, Lawyer sanctions personal misconduct, Uncategorized | Tagged Lawyer conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice, lawyer ethics, lawyer misconduct abusive language and cursing in e-mail to Bar lawyer | Leave a comment
  • Recent Posts

    • Florida Bar provides notice that proposed opinion stating that out-of-state lawyer may practice law remotely is pending final court action
    • Florida Bar Best Practices for Professional Electronic Communication: electronic hearings or proceedings
    • ABA Formal Opinion 496 addresses ethics issues related to lawyer responses to online criticism and provides guidance
    • ABA Formal Opinion 495 addresses ethics and UPL issues related to lawyers working remotely and provides guidance
    • U.S. District Court Judge enjoins Pennsylvania from enforcing Bar rule with broad lawyer anti-discrimination prohibitions
  • Recent Comments

    Autism Candles on U.S. District Court Judge enjo…
    Déjà vu: Do Redactio… on Illinois Disciplinary Commissi…
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
  • Categories

    • 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions
    • 2017 New Jersey Joint Ethics Opinion AVVO referral service violates Bar Rules
    • 2018 Florida lawyer referral rule revisions matching services
    • 2018 Florida lawyer referral rules qualifying providers
    • 2018 New Jersey Supreme Court order denying review of 2017 AVVO joint ethics opinion
    • 2018 proposed Florida RJA 2.505 revisions- stand-in covering substitute counsel
    • 2018 revised Bar Rule- Florida Lawyer use of expert and specialist
    • 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice
    • 2019 California non-lawyer practice and ownership of law firms proposals
    • 2020 Arizona Supreme Court permits non-lawyer fee sharing and ownership of law firms
    • 2020 Utah pilot program permitting non-lawyer practice and law firm ownership
    • 4-5.8 lawyers leaving law firms
    • ABA advisory opinion 495 lawyers practicing remotely
    • ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 481- lawyer required to advise current clients of material error
    • ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 484- third party financing of attorneys fees
    • ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 493 Model Rule 8.4(g) prohibiting harassment and discrimination based upon, inter alia, race, sex, religion, national origin, and sexual orientation
    • ABA Formal Opinion 483- lawyer obligations before and after cyber hack or breach
    • ABA Formal Opinion 487 division of fees in contingency matters when lawyer is replaced
    • ABA Formal Opinion 487 division of fees in contingent matters when lawyer is replaced
    • ABA Formal Opinion 492- obligations regarding prospective clients
    • ABA Formal Opinion 496 responding to online complaints and criticism
    • ABA Formal Opinion 496 responding to online complkaints and criticism
    • ABA formal opinion referral fees and conflict of interest
    • ABA formal opinion securing confidential information sent over internet
    • ABA Formal Opinion- use of former client confidentiality information generally known exception
    • ABA Informal Opinion 1467- filing lawsuit when client is missing
    • ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
    • ABA opinion 480- confidentiality and lawyer blogs and other public commentary
    • ABA Opinion 488- judge recusal disqualification personal relationships
    • ABA opinion 491- lawyer's obligation to avoid counseling or assisting client in crime or fraud
    • ABA opinion lawyer's duties re receipt of subpoena for confidential documents information
    • ABA opinions
    • ABA Resolution 105 non-lawyer ownership of law firms
    • ABA Resolutions
    • ABA revised advertising rules
    • Advanced Registered Paralegal Program
    • Arizona limited legal advice pilot program 2020-2021
    • Attorney discipline
    • Attorney disobey order of tribunal
    • Attorney disqualification
    • Attorney disruptive conduct in litigation
    • Attorney ethics
    • Attorney Ethics sharing fees
    • attorney-client privilege
    • Attorney/client confidentiality
    • Attorney/client privilege
    • AVVO – BOG opinion that AVVO Advisors is a lawyer referral service
    • AVVO Legal Advisor- termination of program/service
    • Bar admission
    • Bar antitrust
    • Bar rule prohibiting Google Ad words misdirection to another lawyer
    • Bar Rules written fee agreements
    • Board of Governors opinion approving charge of cost of litigation cost protection insurance to client
    • California adopts ABA Model Rules
    • California Bar Rules 2018
    • California ethics opinion using improper document
    • California ethics opinion using improperly obtained document
    • California law requires split of lawyer regulation and trade association activities
    • Chapter 23, Registered Online Services
    • client false online statement libel
    • client libel
    • Client with disability
    • Communication with client
    • communication with potential clients
    • competence
    • Confidential Information
    • Confidentiality
    • Confidentiality and lawyer response to internet complaint criticism
    • conflict of interest "hot potato" doctrine
    • Conflict of interest criminal cases
    • Conflict of interest current clients
    • conflict of interest- former clients
    • Contingency fees – lawyer retaining another lawyer or entity to resolve liens
    • corsmeier
    • Criminal misconduct murder for hire
    • Daparting lawyer and law firm ethical responsibilities
    • deceit
    • diligence
    • dishonesty
    • Disqualification
    • e-mail with disparaging comments regarding spouse and opposing counsel
    • Ethics and lawyer withdrawal
    • Ethics and nonlawyer compensation
    • ethics and UPL out of state lawyers practicing remotely
    • Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor
    • Ethics opinion lawyer blogging
    • Ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency
    • Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in border search
    • Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in search of digital device
    • Ethics Opinions
    • Ethics Opinions waivers of ineffective assistance and prosecutorial misconduct
    • Ethics Opinions waivers of prosecutotial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel
    • ethics related to electronic hearings and proceedings
    • Excessive fee
    • federal court sanctions
    • financial assistance to client
    • Florida Advanced Registered Paralegal program- 2020
    • Florida advertising "Ambulances Chase Us"
    • Florida Bar
    • Florida Bar CLE
    • Florida Bar discipline
    • Florida Bar ethics
    • Florida Bar ethics opinion 14-1- lawyer ethics and client social media pages
    • Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 18-1- lawyer referral service qualifying provider payment
    • Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 20-1 responding to online complaints and criticism
    • Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 72-36- filing lawsuit when client is missing
    • Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality
    • Florida Bar ethics opinion qualifying provider – lawyer fees
    • Florida Bar non-lawyer Registered Online Service Provider Program
    • Florida Bar Opinion 16-1 financial assistance to client
    • Florida Bar Opinion 18-1 payment to qualifying providers
    • Florida Bar proposed Advertising Advisory Opinion
    • Florida Bar proposed ethics advisory opinion lawyer electronic signatures
    • Florida Bar proposed ethics opinion 17-2- qualifying provider- lawyer fees
    • Florida Bar Registered Online Service Provider Program
    • Florida Bar request for Florida Supreme Court TIKD UPL review
    • Florida Bar rule 4-1.5 resolution of extraordinary liens in contingency cases
    • Florida Bar rule 4-1.8(c) amended rule all gifts from clients prohibited
    • Florida Bar rule 4-1.8(e) financial assistance to client
    • Florida Bar Rule 4-3.1 frivolous filings
    • Florida Bar Rule 4-3.4(b) payments and inducements to fact witnesses
    • Florida Bar Rule 4-5.8 lawyers leaving law firms
    • Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 proposed comment communication with potential clients
    • Florida Bar Rule 8.4(d) conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
    • Florida Bar rule permitting lawyer to charge client with credit card fees
    • Florida Bar Rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in advertisementss
    • Florida Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all advertisements
    • Florida Bar Rules
    • Florida Bar Rules Chapter 20 registered paralegal
    • Florida Bar Rules contingent fee agreements
    • Florida Bar Rules diversion
    • Florida Bar rules qualifying providers
    • Florida Bar Rules Reporting Misconduct
    • Florida Bar Rules trust account funds
    • Florida Bar Rules Trust Accounts
    • Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit
    • Florida Bar UPL
    • Florida Bar v TIKD oral argument
    • Florida Bar v. TIKD referee report
    • Florida Bar- proposed rule would make finding of frivolous filing "conclusive determination" of Bar rule violation
    • Florida Code for Reolving Professionalsim Complaints
    • Florida Judge discipline
    • Florida Judge ethics
    • Florida Judicial Canons
    • Florida lawyer 2017 mandatory technology CLE requirements and increase in hours and
    • Florida lawyer advertising
    • Florida lawyer advertising "411-PAIN"
    • Florida lawyer advertising expert and specialist 2019 rule 4-7.14
    • Florida lawyer advertising past results
    • Florida lawyer cloud computing
    • Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions
    • Florida lawyer covering counsel proposed rules
    • Florida lawyer discipline- referee requires Bar to pay accused lawyer costs
    • Florida lawyer mandatory technology competence CLE
    • Florida Lawyer Professionalsim
    • Florida Lawyer Referral Services
    • Florida lawyer trust accounts
    • Florida limited practice by paralegals
    • Florida Proposed Advisory Opinion FAO #2019-4
    • Florida proposed ethics advisory opinion- lawyer referral fees and lawyer matching services
    • Florida proposed Ethics Opinion charging clients interest on advanced costs
    • Florida Rules of Judicial Administration RJA
    • Florida solicitation rule 4-7.18 social media class action
    • Florida Statutes lawyer fiduciary privilege
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Florida Supreme Court lawyer fiduciary privilege
    • Florida Supreme Court opinion- Judge Facebook and social media friendship with lawyer not per se prohibited
    • Florida Supreme Court opinions
    • Florida Supreme Court rejection of Bar proposed rule amendment on resolution of extraordinary liens in contingency matters
    • Florida Supreme Court Rule 4-3.4(b) payments and inducements to fact witnesses
    • Florida unlicensed practice of law
    • Florida unlicensed practice of law TIKD
    • Florida UPL opinion out of state lawyers practicing in Florida
    • Florida UPL out of state lawyers
    • Florida voluntary online legal provider program
    • former judge lawyer accepting gifts from counsel for opposing party
    • fraud
    • Impersonating lawyer criminal conviction and prison
    • inadvertent disclosure
    • Indiana ethics opinion 18-1- AVVO Advisor violation of fee, referral and other Bar rules
    • Ineffective Assistance of Counsel lawyer ethics
    • joe corsmeier
    • Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees
    • joseph corsmeier
    • Judge discipline Facebook
    • Judge discipline likes and shares social media
    • Judge disqualification
    • Judge disqualification Facebook friends with lawyer
    • judge disqualification Facebook friends with lawyer Florida Supreme Court
    • Judge ethics and due process Facebook friends with litigant
    • Judge recusal personal relationships
    • Judicial candidate misconduct
    • Judicial ethics accepting gifts from lawyers
    • Judicial Ethics Facebook and LinkedIn
    • judicial misconduct discipline
    • lack of diligence
    • Lawsuit against law firm alleging lawyer liability for wire transfer fraud scam
    • Lawyer abuse of nonlawyer paralegal and attacks
    • Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail
    • Lawyer abusive language and cursing in e-mail to Bar lawyer
    • lawyer accepting online payments using apps
    • Lawyer access to juror social media and digital internet presence
    • Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection
    • Lawyer advertising
    • Lawyer advertising actors reading testimonials
    • Lawyer advertising and soliciation text messages
    • Lawyer advertising and solicitation
    • Lawyer advertising and solicitation APRL report
    • Lawyer advertising and solicitation text messages
    • Lawyer advertising and solicitation twitter
    • lawyer advertising expert and specialist
    • Lawyer advertising judicial opinion excerpts on website
    • Lawyer advertising on Linkedin.com
    • lawyer advertising past results
    • Lawyer advertising rules federal lawsuit
    • Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise
    • Lawyer advertising testimonials
    • Lawyer allegedly killing mother
    • lawyer antitrust
    • Lawyer arbitrator discipline
    • lawyer blogs
    • Lawyer blogs advertising
    • lawyer blogs false statements
    • lawyer certification
    • Lawyer charge cost of litigation cost protection to client
    • Lawyer charging client with credit card fees
    • Lawyer charging interest to clients on advanced costs
    • Lawyer cloud computing
    • lawyer communications with potential clients
    • Lawyer conduct adversely affecting fitness to practice
    • Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
    • Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice
    • Lawyer confidentiality when working remotely and from home
    • Lawyer conflict of interest
    • Lawyer conflict of interest positional conflicts
    • Lawyer conflict of interest relationship with witness
    • Lawyer contingency agreements
    • Lawyer conversion of client trust funds
    • Lawyer criminal misconduct
    • Lawyer criminal misconduct murder for hire
    • Lawyer criminal misconduct sexual abuse of client by hypnotism
    • Lawyer derogatory comments to nonpaying client in e-mail
    • lawyer digital document storage
    • Lawyer disbarment
    • lawyer disbarment burglary and theft
    • Lawyer disbarment for practicing while suspended
    • Lawyer disbarment forging court order
    • Lawyer disbarment stealing and using cocaine as judge
    • Lawyer disbarment theft of client funds
    • Lawyer disbarment trust account violations
    • Lawyer discipline conviction of passing contraband to client in jail
    • Lawyer discipline criminal conviction battery chest bump
    • Lawyer discipline criminal misconduct
    • Lawyer discipline false billings
    • lawyer discipline for failure to respond to Bar inquiry
    • Lawyer discipline for willful and flagrant failure to pay child support
    • Lawyer discipline forging court order
    • Lawyer discipline improper and inflated fees
    • Lawyer discipline lying to law firm suspension
    • Lawyer discipline sanctions for failure to appear at hearing
    • Lawyer discipline sexting texting with client
    • lawyer discipline social media misconduct- creating false dating site profile on opposing counsel
    • Lawyer discipline trust account violations
    • Lawyer discipline- Bar required to pay attorney's costs
    • Lawyer discipline- Bar's costs denied by referee
    • lawyer disciplinefor failure to disclose client’s death while continuing to litigate matter
    • Lawyer discovery disclosure sanctions
    • Lawyer disloyalty to client and law firm
    • Lawyer dismissal of complaint
    • Lawyer dismissed complaint
    • Lawyer disparagement and discrimination
    • lawyer disparaging other lawyers and judges in pleadings
    • lawyer disparaging remarks to non-client witness
    • Lawyer disqualification
    • Lawyer disruption of tribunal
    • Lawyer divorce contingent fee discipline
    • lawyer double billing
    • Lawyer duties to replace hacked trust account funds
    • Lawyer e-filing confidentiality breach sanctions
    • Lawyer escrow accounts
    • lawyer ethical and professional risks and hazards of sending e-mails
    • Lawyer ethical duties when receives earned fee subject to fee sharing arrangement
    • Lawyer ethical obligations regarding third party funding of attorneys fees and litigation
    • Lawyer Ethics
    • Lawyer ethics and social media
    • Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing
    • Lawyer ethics business transactions with clients
    • Lawyer ethics Facebook
    • Lawyer ethics opinion anonymous contact with unnamed internet defamer
    • Lawyer ethics opinion impaired lawyers
    • Lawyer ethics opinion Linkedin.com
    • Lawyer ethics opinions
    • Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo – improper fee splitting and referral fees
    • Lawyer ethics opinions blogs and advertising
    • Lawyer ethics opinions cloud computing
    • Lawyer ethics payments to fact witnesses
    • Lawyer ethics responsibilities and obligations to prospective clients
    • Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment
    • Lawyer expense reimbursement
    • lawyer failure to communicate
    • Lawyer failure to communicate with client
    • lawyer failure to disclose client’s death while continuing to litigate matter
    • Lawyer failure to provide closing statement PIP cases
    • Lawyer failure to supervise non lawyer theft of trust funds disbarment
    • Lawyer failure to supervise non-lawyers
    • lawyer failure to supervise non-lawyers re trust account suspension and permanent ban on supervision of trust accounts
    • lawyer false expenses
    • lawyer false fee liens
    • Lawyer false statements
    • Lawyer false statements on Facebook
    • Lawyer false statements to client
    • Lawyer falsifying court documents and orders
    • Lawyer fee agreements
    • lawyer felony suspension and reinstatement nunc pro tunc after criminal conviction reversed
    • lawyer fiduciary privilege
    • Lawyer filing false documents
    • Lawyer Florida IOTA trust accounts rule 5-1.1 credit unions permitted
    • Lawyer fraud
    • Lawyer Groupon marketing
    • Lawyer hijacking former firm’s e-mail accounts and making disparaging comments on Facebook
    • Lawyer improper access to opposing party Facebook
    • Lawyer improper access to opposing party social media
    • Lawyer improper ex parte contact with judge
    • Lawyer impugning judge's qualifications or integrity
    • Lawyer including client confidential psychiatric records in public record malpractice lawsuit
    • Lawyer involvement in wire transfer fraud scam
    • Lawyer IOTA trust accounts
    • Lawyer lack of competence
    • lawyer lack of diligence
    • Lawyer leaving law firm
    • Lawyer lien resolution
    • Lawyer litigation costs
    • Lawyer mandatory fees and dues
    • Lawyer misappropriation of funds
    • Lawyer misconduct 6 month suspension for brandishing gun at deposition and disparaging comments
    • Lawyer misconduct disparaging and improper comments
    • Lawyer misconduct false court documents
    • Lawyer misconduct false statements
    • lawyer misconduct in closing argument
    • Lawyer misconduct jail sentence
    • Lawyer misconduct marijuana advice incompetence and misrepresentation
    • Lawyer misconduct representing self in divorce
    • Lawyer misconduct smuggling contraband into prison for client
    • Lawyer misconduct while representing self in divorce proceeding
    • Lawyer misleading law firm information advertisements
    • Lawyer misrepresentation
    • lawyer misrepresentations
    • Lawyer negative Yelp review
    • lawyer negligence
    • Lawyer non compete in employment agreement
    • Lawyer obligations before and after cyber breach or hack
    • lawyer permanent disbarment
    • Lawyer positional conflict of interest
    • Lawyer practicing l;aw while suspended
    • Lawyer practicing without license
    • Lawyer prepring false documents
    • Lawyer Professional Responsibility
    • Lawyer professionalism
    • Lawyer puffery
    • Lawyer punitive separation agreeement with associate
    • lawyer ransomware attack
    • Lawyer readmission denial
    • lawyer referral fees
    • Lawyer referral fees legal malpractice
    • Lawyer referral fees void under Chandris
    • Lawyer Referral Services
    • Lawyer referral services 2016 proposed revisions
    • Lawyer relationship with witness and lying about it
    • Lawyer required to advise current clients of material error- ABA opinion
    • lawyer response to internet complaint and criticism
    • Lawyer restriction on right to practice in employment agreement
    • lawyer revealing confidential information in motion to withdraw
    • Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint
    • Lawyer sanction- writing promising no more disruption
    • Lawyer sanctions
    • Lawyer sanctions alcohol/substance abuse
    • Lawyer sanctions disbarment
    • Lawyer sanctions disclosure of confidential documents
    • Lawyer sanctions false client billings
    • Lawyer sanctions for failing to advise clients of suspension
    • Lawyer sanctions for revealing confidential information
    • Lawyer sanctions for unlicensed practice of law
    • Lawyer sanctions frivolous filing
    • Lawyer sanctions Instagram
    • Lawyer sanctions lying in court and Instagram vacation photos
    • Lawyer sanctions personal misconduct
    • Lawyer sanctions revealing client confidences to lawyer with romantic relationship
    • Lawyer sanctions stealing from law firm
    • Lawyer second opinions
    • Lawyer sex with client discipline
    • Lawyer sex with clients in jail disbarment
    • Lawyer sexual abuse of clients
    • Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers
    • lawyer social media ethics and discipline
    • Lawyer solicitation rules social media class action
    • Lawyer soliciting or accepting gifts
    • lawyer stealing and using cocaine as judge
    • lawyer stealing fees from law firm
    • lawyer stealing firm funds with improper referrals
    • Lawyer submitting false document in disciplinary investigation
    • lawyer suing client for false online statements
    • Lawyer supervision of clients
    • Lawyer suspension criminal conviction passing contraband
    • Lawyer suspension for “excessively aggressive” and threatening conduct
    • Lawyer suspension stealing fees from law firm
    • Lawyer suspension/discipline alleged sexual misconduct
    • Lawyer technology competence
    • lawyer technology competence- scams and ransomware attacks
    • Lawyer technology ethics- wire transfer fraud scam
    • Lawyer testamentary gifts from clients
    • Lawyer trust account discipline
    • Lawyer trust account ethics
    • Lawyer trust account scams
    • Lawyer trust account violations discipline
    • Lawyer trust accounts
    • lawyer unreasonable fee
    • Lawyer use of expert and specialist
    • Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet
    • lawyer waiver of costs
    • lawyer waiver of costs financial assistance to client
    • Lawyer websites
    • Lawyer websites hidden text
    • Lawyer websites SEO and metatags
    • Lawyer withdrawal
    • Lawyer withdrawal COVID-19
    • Lawyer written fee agreements
    • Lawyer/client confidentiality
    • Lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency
    • Lawyers and bitcoin
    • Lawyers and social media
    • Lawyers and virtual digital currency
    • lawyers sharing fees with non-lawyers
    • Legal malpractice
    • Legal malpractice expert witness
    • Legal malpractice negligence
    • Legal malpractice sufficiency of evidence and standard of care
    • LegalForce v LegalZoom UPL and deceptive advertising federal lawsuit
    • Mandatory arbitration Bar Rule 4-1.5(i)
    • Mandatory arbitration clause in fee agreement unenforceable as violation of Rule 4-1.5(i)
    • Metadata
    • Metadata Lawyer Ethics
    • Misrepresentations regarding CLE completion
    • Motion to Disqualify Facebook friends
    • Nebraska ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin
    • negligence
    • New York Bar admission mental health questions
    • New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations
    • Non-lawyer Limited Licensing
    • non-lawyer limited practice
    • Non-lawyer ownership of law firms
    • Non-lawyer practice of law
    • Nonlawyer bonuses and pension plans
    • nonrefundable fees
    • North Caroline federal opinion on regulation of UPL
    • NYSBA ethics opinion COVID withdrawal
    • Payments to fact witnesses
    • Pennsylvania ethics opinion maintaining confidentiality during pandemic
    • privilege prohibition of inquiries into lawyer/doctor referral relationships
    • Proposed Florida Bar ethics opinion 20-1- response to negative online reviews
    • Proposed Florida UPL Advisory Opinion FAO #201904 out-of-state lawyer practicing remotely
    • Prosectorial misconduct
    • Prosecutor disbarment for posting anonymous inflammatory comments on internet
    • Prosecutor misconduct
    • Prosecutorial misconduct disciplinary sanctions
    • Prosecutorial misconduct eavesdropping on attorney client conversations
    • Prosecutorial misconduct lawyer ethics
    • Punitive damages
    • remote hearings and proceedings ethics
    • Rule 4-5.8 amendment to comment 2018
    • Rule 8.4(h) conduct adversely affecting fitness to practice
    • Sanctions inadvertent disclousre fo confidential documents
    • TIKD antitrust lawsuit Florida Bar motion for sanctions
    • TIKD Florida Bar petition w Florida Supreme Court re UPL
    • TIKD motion for sanctions
    • TIKD Unlicensed Practice of Law Florida
    • TIKD US DOJ Statement of Interest
    • U.S. District Court Judge enjoins Pennsylvania from enforcing Bar rule with broad lawyer anti-discrimination prohibitions
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • U.S. Supreme Court mandatory Bar dues
    • Uncategorized
    • Unlicensed practice of law
    • UPL federal mail and identity fraud
    • UPL fraud impersonating lawyer
    • UPL North Carolina antitrust
    • UPL opinions
    • UPL Zlien Ohio complaint
    • UPL, unauthorized practice of law, unlicensed practice of law, U.S. Constitution professional speech
    • USSC North Carolina dental antitrust case
    • Utah pilot program permitting non-traditional legal services, including non-lawyer firm ownership
    • Utah sandbox approves Rocket Matter as legal service rovider
    • Virginia Ethics Opinion duties related to impaired lawyers
    • Virginia revised advertising rules 2017
    • Washington DC rules related to non-lawyer firm ownership and sharing fees
    • Washington Limited License Legal Technician program
    • Washington LLLT sunset elimination 2020
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
joe corsmeier
Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy