Tag Archives: lawyer advertising rules

Florida Bar Board of Governors finds that “Ambulances Chase Us” is improper and law firm can advertise “1-800-411-Pain”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG) decisions to uphold the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Advertising (SCA) decision that “Ambulances Chase Us” is deceptive or misleading and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Florida advertising "Ambulances Chase Us", Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida lawyer advertising "411-PAIN", joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors approves proposed Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all lawyer advertisements

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent approval of revisions to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 by the Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG).  If implemented, the proposed revisions would prohibit misleading law firm information … Continue reading

Posted in deceit, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in advertisementss, Florida Bar rule prohibiting misleading law firm information in all advertisements, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyer misleading law firm information advertisements, Lawyers and social media, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors Ethics Committee will reconsider proposed revised Bar rules to prohibit misleading digital advertising

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the Florida Bar Board of Governors’ (BOG) Professional Ethics Committee’s review of a proposal to amend Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 to prohibit certain misleading digital advertisements at its December … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Bar rule prohibiting Google Ad words misdirection to another lawyer, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer websites SEO and metatags, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s BOG considers rule revisions prohibiting misleading Google ad words and permitting credit charges to clients

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the Board of Governor’s review of potential revisions to Florida Bar Rules 4-7.13, which would prohibit misleading words and phrases in Google ad words, and revisions to Florida Bar … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Bar rule prohibiting Google Ad words misdirection to another lawyer, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar rule permitting lawyer to charge client with credit card fees, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer charging client with credit card fees, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors considers Bar Rule amendment prohibiting lawyers from using Google AdWords to misdirect results

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 which would prohibit a Florida lawyer from using the name of another lawyer or law firm to trigger a search … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Supreme Court rejects Bar proposed advertising Rule amendment on lawyers’ use of “expert” and “specialist”

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert update on the Bar’s proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 on lawyers’ of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements which was filed in response to the federal court opinion which found the rule … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer advertising expert and specialist, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

New York ethics opinion finds that fees paid to Avvo for legal services violate Bar referral, fee splitting, and advertising rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (August 8, 2017) New York Ethics Opinion 1132 which found that lawyers in New York are prohibited from participating in AVVO’s client referral services.  This opinion found that … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics and nonlawyer compensation, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment