Tag Archives: lawyer advertising rules

Florida Bar’s BOG considers rule revisions prohibiting misleading Google ad words and permitting credit charges to clients

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the Board of Governor’s review of potential revisions to Florida Bar Rules 4-7.13, which would prohibit misleading words and phrases in Google ad words, and revisions to Florida Bar … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Bar rule prohibiting Google Ad words misdirection to another lawyer, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar rule permitting lawyer to charge client with credit card fees, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer charging client with credit card fees, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors considers Bar Rule amendment prohibiting lawyers from using Google AdWords to misdirect results

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 which would prohibit a Florida lawyer from using the name of another lawyer or law firm to trigger a search … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Supreme Court rejects Bar proposed advertising Rule amendment on lawyers’ use of “expert” and “specialist”

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert update on the Bar’s proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 on lawyers’ of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements which was filed in response to the federal court opinion which found the rule … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer advertising expert and specialist, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

New York ethics opinion finds that fees paid to Avvo for legal services violate Bar referral, fee splitting, and advertising rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (August 8, 2017) New York Ethics Opinion 1132 which found that lawyers in New York are prohibited from participating in AVVO’s client referral services.  This opinion found that … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics and nonlawyer compensation, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

California Ethics Opinion addresses ethics issues related to lawyer blogging and advertising and provides guidelines

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent California Formal Ethics Opinion which addresses ethics issues related to lawyer blogging and advertising and provides guidelines for lawyers who blog.  The Opinion is The State Bar … Continue reading

Posted in joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, lawyer advertising past results, lawyer blogs, Lawyer blogs advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer ethics opinions blogs and advertising, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Bar will file petition with advertising rule amendment regarding lawyer’s use of “expert” and “specialist” on October 15, 2016

Hello and welcome to this u Ethics Alert regarding the proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 with new subsection 4-1.14(a)(5) related to claims of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements.  The BOG approved the rule amendment and the Bar will … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Lawyer Professionalsim, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer advertising rules federal lawsuit, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, lawyer certification, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer use of expert and specialist, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

N.J. Supreme Court reverses reprimand and dismisses complaint against lawyer who posted allegedly confidential information on his website

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert blog which will discuss the recent New Jersey Supreme Court opinion reversing a Disciplinary Review Board’s reprimand recommendation and dismissing a complaint against lawyer who was alleged to have posted client confidential … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer dismissal of complaint, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment