Tag Archives: Florida Bar Advertising Rules

Florida Bar Board of Governors finds that “Ambulances Chase Us” is improper and law firm can advertise “1-800-411-Pain”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Bar Board of Governors (BOG) decisions to uphold the Florida Bar Standing Committee on Advertising (SCA) decision that “Ambulances Chase Us” is deceptive or misleading and … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Florida advertising "Ambulances Chase Us", Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida lawyer advertising "411-PAIN", joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors approves revised rule on qualifying provider fees and ethics opinion on “expert” and “specialist”

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (October 12, 2018) vote of The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors to approve substantive revisions to Bar Rule 4-7.14 related to the use of “expert” and “specialist” and to … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Florida lawyer referral rule revisions matching services, 2018 Florida lawyer referral rules qualifying providers, 2018 revised Bar Rule- Florida Lawyer use of expert and specialist, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 18-1- lawyer referral service qualifying provider payment, Florida Bar ethics opinion qualifying provider - lawyer fees, Florida Bar proposed Advertising Advisory Opinion, Florida Bar proposed ethics opinion 17-2- qualifying provider- lawyer fees, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Lawyer Referral Services, Florida proposed ethics advisory opinion- lawyer referral fees and lawyer matching services, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer Referral Services, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Supreme Court rejects Bar proposed rule amendment on resolution of extraordinary liens in contingency matters

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert update blog which will discuss the Florida Supreme Court’s rejection of a proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-1.5(f) which would have permitted a lawyer to retain and pay another lawyer (or non-lawyer … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Contingency fees - lawyer retaining another lawyer or entity to resolve liens, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court opinions, Florida Supreme Court rejection of Bar proposed rule amendment on resolution of extraordinary liens in contingency matters, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors considers Bar Rule amendment prohibiting lawyers from using Google AdWords to misdirect results

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 which would prohibit a Florida lawyer from using the name of another lawyer or law firm to trigger a search … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Bar will file petition with advertising rule amendment regarding lawyer’s use of “expert” and “specialist” on October 15, 2016

Hello and welcome to this u Ethics Alert regarding the proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 with new subsection 4-1.14(a)(5) related to claims of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements.  The BOG approved the rule amendment and the Bar will … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Lawyer Professionalsim, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer advertising rules federal lawsuit, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, lawyer certification, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer use of expert and specialist, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors votes to prohibit actors from reading client testimonials in lawyer advertisements

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert blog which will discuss the May 2016 decision of the Florida Bar’s Board of Governors (BOG) to prohibit client testimonials read by actors in lawyer advertisements. According to an article in the … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising actors reading testimonials, Lawyer advertising testimonials, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar Board of Governors will consider final action on rule amendment regarding use of “expert” and “specialist”

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert blog which will discuss the upcoming Florida Bar Board of Governors meeting this week in Palm Beach wherein the BOG is scheduled to vote on final action regarding a proposed amendment to Florida … Continue reading

Posted in 2013 comprehensive Florida advertising rule revisions, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising rules federal lawsuit, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer Professional Responsibility, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment