Tag Archives: attorney advertising

Indiana ethics opinion finds that AVVO Advisor services may violate referral, fee splitting, and advertising rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (April 2018) Indiana Ethics Opinion 1-18 which found that AVVO’s client referral services may violate Indiana Bar rules related to fee sharing with a non-lawyer, improper referral fees … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, Ethics Opinion AVVO Advisor, Indiana ethics opinion 18-1- AVVO Advisor violation of fee, referral and other Bar rules, joe corsmeier, Joint New Jersey ethics opinion- AVVO legal services are improper fee sharing and referral fees, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, Lawyer ethics- AVVO lawyer independent professional judgment, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s Board of Governors considers Bar Rule amendment prohibiting lawyers from using Google AdWords to misdirect results

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.13 which would prohibit a Florida lawyer from using the name of another lawyer or law firm to trigger a search … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertisements Google AdWords misdirection, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Supreme Court adopts substantial revisions to Bar rules related to private lawyer referral services

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert Update which will discuss the recent (March 8, 2018) Florida Supreme Court opinion approving amendments to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.22 related to private and for profit lawyer referrals.  The amendments substantially revise … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Florida lawyer referral rule revisions matching services, 2018 Florida lawyer referral rules qualifying providers, Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Lawyer Referral Services, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics AVVO and matching services- fee splitting and sharing, Lawyer ethics opinions Avvo - improper fee splitting and referral fees, lawyer referral fees, Lawyer Referral Services, Lawyer referral services 2016 proposed revisions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Florida Supreme Court rejects Bar proposed advertising Rule amendment on lawyers’ use of “expert” and “specialist”

Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert update on the Bar’s proposed amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.14 on lawyers’ of “specialization” and “expertise” in advertisements which was filed in response to the federal court opinion which found the rule … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar discipline, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida lawyer advertising, Florida Lawyer comprehensive advertising rule revisions, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer advertising expert and specialist, Lawyer advertising specialization and expertise, Lawyer Ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

New York ethics opinion finds that fees paid to Avvo for legal services violate Bar referral, fee splitting, and advertising rules

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent (August 8, 2017) New York Ethics Opinion 1132 which found that lawyers in New York are prohibited from participating in AVVO’s client referral services.  This opinion found that … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics and nonlawyer compensation, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, New York ethics opinion- AVVO legal services improper fee sharing, referral fees, and recommendations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Virginia Supreme Court makes revisions to lawyer advertising rules which streamline the rules and reduce their number

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent Virginia Supreme Court opinion which adopted revisions to the Virginia Bar Rules which streamline the lawyer advertising rules and reduce the number of rules.  The Virginia Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, Lawyer advertising and solicitation, Lawyer advertising and solicitation APRL report, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyers and social media, Uncategorized, Virginia revised advertising rules 2017 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

California Ethics Opinion addresses ethics issues related to lawyer blogging and advertising and provides guidelines

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent California Formal Ethics Opinion which addresses ethics issues related to lawyer blogging and advertising and provides guidelines for lawyers who blog.  The Opinion is The State Bar … Continue reading

Posted in joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer advertising, lawyer advertising past results, lawyer blogs, Lawyer blogs advertising, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer ethics opinions blogs and advertising, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment