Category Archives: joe corsmeier

Advanced Registered Paralegal program allowing limited practice sent to Bar Rules Committee for review

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will update the status of the Advanced Florida Registered Paralegal designation as part of the Florida Registered Paralegal Program in Chapter 20, the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. As I previously … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice, 2019 California non-lawyer practice and ownership of law firms proposals, Advanced Registered Paralegal Program, Arizona limited legal advice pilot program 2020-2021, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Bar Rules Chapter 20 registered paralegal, Florida limited practice by paralegals, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, non-lawyer limited practice, Non-lawyer practice of law, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Proposed North Carolina Bar ethics opinion states that lawyers may only make “restrained” responses to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss recent proposed North Carolina Bar 2020 Formal Ethics Opinion 1, which states that lawyers are prohibited from revealing confidential information in response to a negative online post; however, the … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics Opinions, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ohio lawyer held in contempt and ordered to promise not to engage in disruptive conduct 25 times in “legible” handwriting

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent contempt order by an Ohio judge for a lawyer’s disruptive conduct which fined the lawyer $500.00 and required him to promise 25 times in “legible” handwriting not … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney disruptive conduct in litigation, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct adversely affecting fitness to practice, Lawyer conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, Lawyer conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice, Lawyer disruption of tribunal, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sanction- writing promising no more disruption, Lawyer sanctions, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Washington D.C. Bar considers relaxing Bar Rules related to non-lawyer law firm ownership and fee splitting

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss a Washington D.C. Bar committee press release announcing a review regarding the potential relaxing of that jurisdiction’s non-lawyer law firm ownership rules, including potential fee sharing/splitting.  The January 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney Ethics sharing fees, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer sharing fees with non-lawyers, Non-lawyer ownership of law firms, Uncategorized, Washington DC rules related to non-lawyer firm ownership and sharing fees | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Florida UPL Committee will consider New Jersey lawyer’s request for formal advisory opinion regarding remote practice from Florida

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss a New Jersey lawyer’s request for formal advisory opinion regarding remote practice related to non-Florida matters from his Florida home.  The lawyer’s request for the formal UPL opinion is … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar UPL, Florida Supreme Court, Florida UPL opinion out of state lawyers practicing in Florida, Florida UPL out of state lawyers, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Uncategorized, UPL opinions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Proposed Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 would permit exchange of contact information at business events and on business related social media

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the proposed revisions to the Comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 which would permit the exchange of contact information at business events and on business-related social media, with caveats. The … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Communication with client, communication with potential clients, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rule 4-7.18 proposed comment communication with potential clients, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer communications with potential clients, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Referee recommends dismissal of Florida Bar UPL Petition against TIKD and oral argument has been scheduled before Florida Supreme Court

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert with an update on the status of The Florida Bar’s Petition alleging that the TIKD business model constitutes UPL and discuss the referee’s report recommending dismissal of the petition and the oral … Continue reading

Posted in Florida Bar, Florida Bar request for Florida Supreme Court TIKD UPL review, Florida Bar UPL, Florida Bar v TIKD oral argument, Florida Bar v. TIKD referee report, Florida Supreme Court, Florida unlicensed practice of law TIKD, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Non-lawyer practice of law, TIKD Florida Bar petition w Florida Supreme Court re UPL, TIKD Unlicensed Practice of Law Florida, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Illinois disciplinary complaint alleges that law firm partner double billed clients and charged personal expenses to firm

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Illinois disciplinary complaint which alleges that a now former law firm partner double billed clients more than $108,674.00 and improperly charged personal expenses of $78,790.43 to the … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney discipline, Attorney ethics, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, fraud, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer conduct adversely affecting fitness to practice, Lawyer discipline false billings, Lawyer discipline improper and inflated fees, lawyer double billing, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer expense reimbursement, lawyer false expenses, Lawyer fraud, Lawyer misappropriation of funds, Lawyer misrepresentation, lawyer misrepresentations, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida Supreme Court Access to Justice Commission approves “Advanced Registered Paralegal” program which would permit the limited practice of law

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert, which will discuss the recent Florida Supreme Court Commission on Access to Civil Justice’s approval of a proposal to create an “Advanced Florida Registered Paralegal” designation as part of the Florida Registered … Continue reading

Posted in 2018 Utah rules permit non-lawyer limited practice, 2019 California non-lawyer practice and ownership of law firms proposals, corsmeier, Florida Advanced Registered Paralegal program- 2020, Florida Bar, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Bar Rules Chapter 20 registered paralegal, Florida limited practice by paralegals, Florida Supreme Court, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Uncategorized, Utah pilot program permitting non-traditional legal services, including non-lawyer firm ownership | Tagged , , | Leave a comment