Category Archives: Confidentiality

Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee approves staff opinion addressing lawyer responses to negative online reviews

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee’s recent approval of Florida Bar Staff Opinion 38049, which addresses lawyer responses to negative online reviews. On June 15, 2018, the Florida Bar’s … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar ethics opinion lawyer response to negative online review complaint and confidentiality, Florida Bar Rules, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer revealing confidential information on internet in response to complaint, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ABA Formal Opinion 479 addresses when lawyers may use “generally known” information related to a former client

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss ABA Formal Opinion 479, which was published on December 15, 2017 and addresses when a lawyer may use information related to the representation of a former client which is … Continue reading

Posted in ABA Formal Opinion- use of former client confidentiality information generally known exception, Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidentiality, corsmeier, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Professional Responsibility, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ABA Formal Opinion 480 addresses lawyer/client confidentiality obligations related to lawyer blogs and other public commentary

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss ABA Formal Opinion 480, which was released on March 6, 2018 and addresses lawyer ethics and confidentiality obligations when engaging in blogging and other public commentary.  The ABA Formal … Continue reading

Posted in ABA opinion 480- confidentiality and lawyer blogs and other public commentary, ABA opinions, Attorney ethics, Attorney/client confidentiality, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics opinion lawyer blogging, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer blogs, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics and social media, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer professionalism, Lawyer violation of confidentiality on internet, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Florida Bar’s former president responds and opposes Bar’s motion to disqualify him from TIKD v. Florida Bar/Ticket Clinic antitrust suit

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert Update which will discuss the recent responses to the Bar’s Motion to Disqualify by its former president, Ramon Abadin.  The Response claims, inter alia, that the information that received was public record; … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney disqualification, Attorney ethics, Bar antitrust, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar ethics, Florida Bar Rules, Florida Bar TIKD antitrust lawsuit, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, lawyer antitrust, Uncategorized, UPL North Carolina antitrust, USSC North Carolina dental antitrust case | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Indiana criminal prosecutor suspended for 4 years for twice eavesdropping on confidential attorney/client conversations

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent Indiana Supreme Court opinion suspending a lawyer for 4 years for eavesdropping on confidential attorney/client conversations with no automatic reinstatement.  The case is In the Matter of … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, deceit, dishonesty, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer false statements, Lawyer sanctions, Prosecutor misconduct, Prosecutorial misconduct disciplinary sanctions, Prosecutorial misconduct eavesdropping on attorney client conversations, Prosecutorial misconduct lawyer ethics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Nebraska ethics opinion finds lawyers can accept payment in digital virtual currency such as Bitcoin

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent Nebraska Ethics Opinion which found that lawyers may accept fees and payments in a digital virtual currency such as Bitcoin.  The ethics opinion is Nebraska Ethics Advisory … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency, Excessive fee, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer escrow accounts, Lawyer Ethics, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer IOTA trust accounts, Lawyer trust accounts, lawyer unreasonable fee, Lawyers accepting bitcoin digital virtual currency, Lawyers and bitcoin, Lawyers and virtual digital currency, Nebraska ethics opinion lawyers accepting bitcoin, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New York Bar opinion states that lawyers must take reasonable steps to protect confidential information in a border search

Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will discuss the recent New York City Bar Association ethics opinion which states that lawyers must take reasonable precautions to protect attorney/client confidential information if the lawyer is searched by U.S … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney ethics, attorney-client privilege, Attorney/client confidentiality, Attorney/client privilege, Confidential Information, Confidentiality, corsmeier, Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in border search, Ethics opinion- protecting client confidentiality in search of digital device, joe corsmeier, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer/client confidentiality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment